Hi, IEEE examines AI across four ethical ontologies: accountability, algorithmic bias, privacy, and transparency. Each ontology is a separate product certification. The certification process is proprietary, so I can't go into details, but you'll see in the attached ontologies that we examine products from the point of various duty holders. There are only five duty holders: developer, integrator, operator, maintainer, and regulator whereas stakeholders is much broader. Regardless, IEEE has created some excellent rubrics in the Annexes of these documents that may be a good starting point for other institutions. Speaking of which, I believe there are multiple presentations at the upcoming Annual Conference on this topic. Dejah From: Zhang, Hui <Hui.Zhang@oregonstate.edu> Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 3:10 PM To: Pate, Davin <djp130330@utdallas.edu>; ai-sig@exlibrisusers.org Subject: *EXT* [Ai-sig] Re: Topic Discussion (Ex Libris/ProQuest/Clarivate AI Products) **External Email** Hello, all: Thank you Davin for initiating this conversation! We at Oregon State University are investigating several AI tools, including Primo Research Assistant, Web of Science RA, and other vendors (Elicit, Scite). For Primo RA, we have: * Enabled it in a test view * Offered a public webinar on AI tools for libraries Initial feedback we have received: * What are the use cases for Primo RA? To patrons, it is unclear what are the benefits and advantages of using it over other AI tools or Primo. * IZ and NZ records are unavailable in Primo RA. * What patrons like is the multilingual feature. For example, you can search in Chinese, get English articles in the results, and the summary is in Chinese. That feature is missing in Primo, but is it available in NDE? I hope to track the information on a spreadsheet and provide it to the related working groups/steering. Maybe we can discuss the strategy as a group. ELUNA? I am planning to attend it, but only on the 19th and 20th. Thanks -- Hui From: Pate, Davin <djp130330@utdallas.edu<mailto:djp130330@utdallas.edu>> Date: Monday, March 31, 2025 at 2:30 PM To: ai-sig@exlibrisusers.org<mailto:ai-sig@exlibrisusers.org> <ai-sig@exlibrisusers.org<mailto:ai-sig@exlibrisusers.org>> Subject: [Ai-sig] Topic Discussion (Ex Libris/ProQuest/Clarivate AI Products) You don't often get email from djp130330@utdallas.edu<mailto:djp130330@utdallas.edu>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> [This email originated from outside of OSU. Use caution with links and attachments.] Hi Everyone, I wanted to begin our initial Topic Discussion series with the following: What Clarivate/ProQuest/Ex Libris AI Products/Tools are you or your university currently investigating? What have you liked about the products and have you seen any Initial problems or concerns regarding the products? If you have seen a significant concern, what case have you submitted, if any, and the case number associated with the issue. I hope to track the information on a spreadsheet and provide it to the related working groups/steering. We have a number of Ex Libris developers on this list so it will also assist with pointing out issues as well as sharing what people are finding helpful. Thanks again for your contributions, Davin Pate, M.L.S. Assistant Director for Scholarly Communications and Collections (972) 883-2908 |davin.pate@utdallas.edu<mailto:%7Cdavin.pate@utdallas.edu> http://www.utdallas.edu/library/ The University of Texas at Dallas [cid:image001.png@01DBA47B.13612D70]<https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/af697753dcc24b9e926afe35e8e84e9d@...> Book time to meet with me<https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/af697753dcc24b9e926afe35e8e84e9d@...> **Notice** This message is from a sender outside of the Ferris Office 365 mail system. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you are unsure if this email is safe, please report it using the Report Suspected Phishing button on the Outlook ribbon and the Information Security Office will review it. ________________________________
