Hi Davin and Ai-sig,
Not a bug/issue, more of an observation.
I’ve been doing a lot of original cataloging lately and after I import the bib record into Alma, I like to run the “Enhance with AI Assistant” feature. I like to have as many access points as possible, especially in the 65X fields, and
find the feature useful for that. The problem is that it repeats other fields unnecessarily, e.g., I will have an author in the 100 field and the AI Assistant will create a 700 field with the exact same information. Just yesterday, I was working on a bulletin
from the 1800s and AI Assistant automatically added 490/830 fields, even though this bulletin wasn’t part of a series.
I like and will continue to use the feature, but I will continue to review each record for accuracy.
V/r,
Debbie
Debbie Frye
Map Librarian
950 National Center, Room 1D100
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive
Reston, VA 20192
From: Pate, Davin <djp130330@utdallas.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2025 4:49 PM
To: ai-sig@exlibrisusers.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Ai-sig] Ex Libris AI Products – Weekly Topical Bugs/Issues. What ongoing bugs/issues have you encountered, and in what product?
|
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. |
Hi Everyone,
I thought I would start a discussion this week on any known bugs you have seen and any resulting support cases that you may have submitted to Ex Libris.
This can be on any Ex Libris AI product. Any bugs shares will be compiled and shared with the respective working groups.
I would also share any Clarivate/ProQuest bugs as well, as Clarivate staff are part of this listserv.
Thanks again,
Davin Pate, M.L.S.
Assistant Director for Scholarly Communications and Collections
(972) 883-2908 |davin.pate@utdallas.edu
http://www.utdallas.edu/library/
The University of Texas at Dallas
|
|
